Define the job to be done
Be clear about what you need: consistent questions, rubrics, seniority tuning, or a full hiring workflow. A narrow preparation tool and an ATS solve different problems; pick for the gap you actually have.
Decide the human-vs-tool split
A tool should structure the first draft, not make the hire. Look for one that gives you an editable set with rubrics and keeps the final call with your panel.
Check rubric and bias controls
The differentiator is usually the rubric. Per-question rubrics plus bias-aware framing help consistency, but they are preparation aids, not a compliance guarantee. Review the output and validate with counsel.
Pricing and export
Expect free tiers to be limited (often one set per day) and paid tiers to add volume and export. InterviewQ is Free at $0, Pro at $19/mo (300 sets per month with rubrics, bias review, history, and export), and Enterprise custom.
A short evaluation checklist
- Does it produce a rubric per question?
- Can you tune to seniority and focus?
- Does it review for relevance and bias?
- Can you edit and export the set?
- Does it stay in its lane (preparation, not hiring decisions)?